Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Topic 1: Technology and Society


The Technological Revolution is in the process of changing the face of society. Lagat states “The integration of computer technology into society will eventually constitute the remaking of society” (Lagat, 2005, p. 84).  Technology should not be judged by its power, speed or cleverness but by its ability to enhance the lives of members of a society and contribute to social cohesiveness.

One of the greatest achievements of technology is its ability to connect members of society regardless of the physical distance between them.  Technology enables individuals to communicate with their families and friends at any time and in any place through: social networking sites such as ‘Facebook, text messaging, conversations on mobile phones and ‘Skype’.  These technologies may do much to make Australia a happy society as Australians view relationships  “as the most important factor contributing to their happiness” (Horin, 2006, September 16).


While the internet is capable of enhancing relationships, technology overuse may encourage weak and superficial communities based around minimal contact.  Additionally ‘cyber handles’ may become alternative personas replacing the individual and devaluing relationships through a false sense of reality.  Some individuals have been found to become obsessed with computer games to the point of addiction, merging their computer identity with reality.  This merging of reality has the potential to result in dire consequences by destroying relationships and in some cases resulting in death (Icon, 2006, July 8).


Social media and smartphones also have their disadvantages.  ‘Facebook’ and text messaging open new avenues for repeated abuse through ‘cyber-bullying’.  “Because the intimidation or bullying action is delivered via the written word… the target can read and therefore be affected by the same words again and again” (Robotham, June 30, 2012).  Bullies are no longer only dependent on their physical stature but may now be characterised by their ability to manipulate technologies.  


Educators, need other educators to collaborate; this is a necessity for creative, innovative education.  Lehrer states, “The most creative ideas, it turns out, don’t occur when we are alone.  Rather, they emerge from our social circles, from collections of acquaintances who inspire novel thought” (Lehrer, 2012, p. 204). Sites such as: ‘Pinterest’, ‘TES’ (Times Education Supplement), and ‘Scootle’ promote the sharing and collaboration of ideas.  Blogs provide the capability to create a twenty-four hour collaborative space, the ‘cyber-staffroom'.

 
Educators have a responsibility to promote Australian values: liberty, equality and fraternity (Mackay, 2006).   Online programs may do much to enhance liberty and equality by enabling teachers to differentiate according to need, and assisting with the early identification and support of children with learning difficulties.  For example ‘Mathletics’ enables teachers to differentiate work programs and homework, track progress and identify children experiencing difficulty.  Another program ‘Fast For Word’ has helped hundreds of thousands of dyslexic children, to improve their concentration and reading skills, to reach the reading level expected for their chronological age or above. (Doidge, 2010, p. 71) The value of fraternity is likewise enhanced by technology through ‘parent portals’ that may strengthen communication between parents and teachers.  This technology enables teachers to alert parents to achievements and areas for improvement through emails and open ‘marks books’ (Timson, 2006).  The use of portals may encourage parents to become a partner, along with the teacher, in their child’s education.

Technology while powerful to society and the workplace must be used to enhance society.  Technology is not human and shouldn’t be treated as such.  It is up to the individual to regulate the time spent on technology and to prioritise relationships with loved ones and friends.  As educators we must evaluate the quality of a technology.  Is it able to: inspire and excite children about learning, assist in accomplishing lesson outcomes and objectives, create stronger relationships between parents, teachers and students and be quickly and easily implemented?  Salvaris states that a good community is “ more nuanced than merely increasing economic production… family relationships are important… the quality of life and services are important”  (Salvaris as sited in Short, August 3, 2012) Our willingness to take the time to evaluate the quality of technologies, as they become available, rather than adopting a technology blindly, will determine our success in complimenting and building a stronger and more cohesive society.

References










No comments:

Post a Comment